Boost logo

Boost :

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-28 12:27:11

Vesa Karvonen wrote:
> Another issue I had with MPL is that it combined an
> applicative function and state into a single parameter
> for higher order functions, like is done STL.

Now it doesn't, and the decision was greatly affected by your arguments,
Vesa! We needed just a little bit of experience to see the problems with the
original MPL approach.

> Personally I would most definitely separate the two like is
> usually done in FP.

Yes, things are _much_ more cleaner this way.

> Ýet another issue in MPL was the insistence on STL like iterators.

Well, these are still here :)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at