From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-28 12:27:11
Vesa Karvonen wrote:
> Another issue I had with MPL is that it combined an
> applicative function and state into a single parameter
> for higher order functions, like is done STL.
Now it doesn't, and the decision was greatly affected by your arguments,
Vesa! We needed just a little bit of experience to see the problems with the
original MPL approach.
> Personally I would most definitely separate the two like is
> usually done in FP.
Yes, things are _much_ more cleaner this way.
> Ýet another issue in MPL was the insistence on STL like iterators.
Well, these are still here :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk