From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-29 13:46:59
> --- In boost_at_y..., "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_m...> wrote:
> > From: <williamkempf_at_h...>
> > > I'd go a step further and require a license.txt file for each
> > > library, UNLESS the library uses a (hypothetical) standard Boost
> > > license.
> > ... *and* doesn't depend on libraries that don't use the
> > standard Boost license.
> Point taken.
> > This isn't really going to save time, though. Every source file
> still needs
> > to be inspected.
I am definitely not a lawyer but it looks to me that _not_ having a
license.txt file doesn't really have any legal meaning. If a particular
source file has an embedded license it will override the "no license.txt"
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk