|
Boost : |
From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-30 16:24:10
Beman Dawes wrote:
> Are you talking about compile time, test program execution time, or both?
Both. However, I think compile time is more important, because
we really don't want to clutter our regression tests with
tests specifically crafted to measure library execution time.
I've added a CPU time output to all "execute" calls (this includes
both compiler and test program execution), which shows up in the
full regression test logs (Unix only for now). Anyone wanting a HTML
page can distill the info from that.
> Regardless, you might want to do some experimentation first to see if there
> are meaningful differences between compilers.
For the preprocessor library, there are huge differences:
GCC is "immediate", Comeau chews along for > 1 minute or so.
Jens Maurer
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk