Re: [boost] Compile Time Overview (was: PREPROCESSOR library is now in CVS)

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-02 20:41:39

Me, too. We could also formalize my template instantiation speed test and
try it with more compilers:

http://users.rcn.com/abrahams/instantiation_speed/index.html

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dietmar Kuehl" <dietmar_kuehl_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Compile Time Overview (was: PREPROCESSOR library is now
in CVS)

> Hi,
> Vesa Karvonen wrote:
>
> > I also think that compiling time is an important quality of
implementation
> > issue. This goes for both compiler vendors _and_ library authors.
>
>
> I whole heartly agree with this statement! Library authors can do a lot
> to reduce compile time, especially when optimization is turned on.
> Unfortunately, even most standard library authors don't care about
> compile time...
> --
> <mailto:dietmar_kuehl_at_[hidden]> <http://www.dietmar-kuehl.de/>
> Phaidros eaSE - Easy Software Engineering: <http://www.phaidros.com/>
>
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>