|
Boost : |
From: Paul F. Kunz (paul_kunz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-04 22:31:54
>>>>> On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 00:24:08 +0000, Michael <f-boost_at_[hidden]> said:
> Prolog: If this has already been addressed, consider me sorry. Is
> serialization of objects a problem worth addressing generally? Are
> there so many diverse goals in this area that they could not all be
> reconciled?
I'm new to this list, but think this topic worthy. Especially if
it can be done in a way that is non-intrusive. That is, that the
objects that are serialize do not have to inherit from a common base
class. I remember reading an article in the now defunct C++ Report
which described a way to do that. That would be great, because if you
custom objects conatained STL objects and still be serializable, that
would be super.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk