Boost logo

Boost :

From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-10 04:28:36


--- In boost_at_y..., Toon Knapen <toon.knapen_at_s...> wrote:
> jhrwalter wrote:

[snip]
 
> > Ok, I understand the problem. May be we'll have to analyze, if
and
> > how it's possible to build a compressed_array with deferred
sorting.
> > BTW aren't others working on array containers with a std::map
like
> > interface already?
>
>
> who are you thinking of ?

See for example the threads following message #14536 and #20286.
 
[snip]
 
> > But it should be possible to get the Fortran storage layout. So
may
> > be one could try to specialize to external functions in this case
> > also.
>
> Well, CSC is defined by using 3 different arrays (Fortran can't
handle
> sotring pairs in a vector ;-) and since it's known to be
performant, it
> would not be too bad for cache performance.
> But indeed, the storage class can indeed choose both strategies. I
might
> implementing a CSC storage a try next week.

Big task :-) If you encounter any problems, feel free to ask us for
support.
 
> (sorry for the lazy indentation, I really need to replace this
lousy
> mozilla with a decent mail client)
 
Best wishes
 
Joerg
 


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk