|
Boost : |
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-11 21:14:40
At 05:51 PM 12/11/2001, mfdylan wrote:
>But why isn't BOOST_NO_SSTREAMS #defined for gcc? Surely that's the
>only reason it's failing config_test (I would have thought nothing
>should fail config_test!)
Fixed. The actual spelling is BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM. The test now passes.
Thanks,
--Beman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk