Re: [boost] Re: Formal review: New Boost.Test Library

From: Mark Rodgers (mark.rodgers_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-13 09:42:29

From: "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_[hidden]>
> What problem exactly?
> Giving a definition of A::Impl (which is missing from the example), it
works
> fine with BCB5.5.1

I'm afraid that would defeat the purpose - this is an implementation of the
pimpl idiom, and so Impl is intended to be not defined at this point.

However I'm not sure what part of the standard says this should work.  I
guess it is implied by a few things in 12.4 and 14.7 but I'm not sure if
the case is water-tight.

Mark