Re: [boost] Re: Fresh Win32 regression test

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-13 11:30:31

At 07:05 AM 12/13/2001, John Maddock wrote:

 >>But why isn't BOOST_NO_SSTREAMS #defined for gcc?  Surely that's the
 >>only reason it's failing config_test (I would have thought nothing
 >>should fail config_test!)
 >
 >Beman is using an out of date gcc version - gcc2.95.3 has a more or less
 >working <sstream> and during the config review some people were pretty
 >adament that BOOST_NO_SSTREAMS should not be defined for gcc 2.95.

OK, I've upgraded to Cygwin's 2.95.3-5 release, and that fixed the problem.

I've backed out #define BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM from CVS.

Test now passes.

--Beman