Re: [boost] Latest Win32 regression results

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-14 11:14:20

Suppose the email that got sent out was titled "Current <platform>
regression failures" instead?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Asger Alstrup Nielsen" <alstrup_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 4:33 AM
Subject: RE: [boost] Latest Win32 regression results

> > |B|C|G|I|M|M|M|
> > |C|O|C|N|W|S|S|
> > |C|M|C|T| | |S|
> > | |O| |E| | |T|
> > | | | |L| | |L|
> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > |*|*| |*|*|*|*| config/test/limits_test.cpp
> > | |*| | | | | | bind/bind_test.cpp
> > | | | | |*| | | concept_check/class_concept_check_test.cpp
> > |*| | | | |*|*| concept_check/class_concept_fail_expected.cpp
>
> It is just me, or is it clear to everybody whether a * denotes a failure
> or a success?
>
> Maybe +/- or v/x would be better, according to the interpretation. Or a
> line with a legend.
>
> Greets,
>
> Asger Alstrup
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Send unsubscribe requests to:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>