Re: [boost] compile-time partial port of bind

From: Mat Marcus (mmarcus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-15 19:10:30

>Okay, I'll do it if you'll let me steal your code and text.

Sure.

>
>Am I right that the following pattern is what triggers the ICE?
>
>template <class UnaryMetaFunction, class T>
>struct X
>{
>     // VC can't handle template-argument-dependent template 'apply'
>     ... UnaryMetaFunction::template apply<T>::type ...;
>};

Yes. Maybe a header file with a generalized n-ary function (like 
mpl::unaryfunction) could provide a good "broken compiler portable" 
idiom.

>And the workaround is illegal because you're not allowed to explicitly
>specialize a nested template inside an unspecialized template. Right?

Yes.