Re: [boost] Proposed metaprogramming type system

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-17 10:36:50

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
I'd say call the thing 'unused' instead...
> 
> An example of an unused argument:
> 
> void f(int)
> {
> }
> 
> An example of a missing argument:
> 
> f();

For the argument to be missing above, we have to have
    void f(T x);
and no declaration:
    void f();

In your case the arguments are there, but defaulted. How about "default"?

-Dave