Re: BCB5, the pimpl idiom bug and the new Unit Test Framework

From: rogeeff (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-20 13:20:05

--- In boost_at_y..., "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_g...> wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: rogeeff <rogeeff_at_m...>
> To: <boost_at_y...>
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:00 PM
> Subject: [boost] Re: BCB5, the pimpl idiom bug and the new Unit Test
> Framework
> 
> 
> > --- In boost_at_y..., "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_g...> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Incidentally, I was set today to the task of writing a new unit
> > test for
> > > some of my code.
> > > I figured that it was a perfect opportunity to give the latest 
Unit
> > Test
> > > Framework a try.
> > >
> > > I created a BCB5 project so as to build up unit_test.dll (BTW, 
it
> > really
> > > needs a jamfile!)
> > >
> > > As soon as I tried to compile it, I stumbled across the BCB bug
> > regarding
> > > the pimpl idiom:
> > >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >
> > > Fernando Cacciola
> > > Sierra s.r.l.
> > > fcacciola_at_g...
> > > www.gosierra.com
> >
> > See a latest update. I remove scoped_ptr from unit_test_main and 
it
> > should work now with BCB5.
> >
> > Gennadiy.
> >
> I downloaded the latest sources this morning.
> There are still places where pimpls are used:
> 
>   test_tools.hpp,  class output_test_stream
>   unit_test_log.hpp, class unit_test_log
> 
> etc...
> 
> Fernando Cacciola
> Sierra s.r.l.
> fcacciola_at_g...
> www.gosierra.com

But I though that you would not have problems with them, cause 
objects containing pimpl's are accessed using pointers.
Did you try to compile? Could you send me a compilation errors?

Gennadiy.