Re: [boost] Re: Review request : format

From: Keith Burton (kb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-22 12:51:51

I agree that it looks fine when used as in the example but I believe the
operator based format wins when long lines are required

cout << pformat(
".................%1..............................%2........................
................................" )
                    %
long_expression.............................................................
............for_parameter_1
                     %
long_expression.............................................................
...........for_parameter_2;

Keith Burton

----- Original Message -----
From: "vonosan" <5045-2h8p_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 10:15 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: Review request : format

> --- In boost_at_y..., "s_krempp" <krempp_at_c...> wrote:
> > string s = pformat("%d, %d")(x)(y).str() ;
>
> For me, it looks nice. IMO, it's even better then all previous
> suggestions including mine.
>
> Alexander Nasonov
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Send unsubscribe requests to:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>