|
Boost : |
From: Kostya Altukhov (kostya_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-25 08:28:00
rogeeff wrote:
>You can always implement runtime format "storage" as a dynamic
>library. And you won't need an executable recompilation.
>
But then it is necessary to rebuild this library.
I do not see much difference between rebuilding the library
and rebuilding the executable in this case. Both solutions are
less convenient than simple text files.
For ex., in my case end-users should be able to modify formats
and change message text. End-users are not programmers and
they would not like the idea to rebuild anything.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk