Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-05 09:57:16

From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> I have suggested several times that we look at the Policy Adaptor pattern
> used by the Iterator Adaptors Library. It certainly makes the problem of
> policy interaction go away, since all of the policies are collected in one
> place... but there have been no replies, and I am wondering why. Is it
> as inappropriate for smart pointers? Are people having trouble
> the suggestion?

Yes (to the second question.)

Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at