From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-05 09:57:16
From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> I have suggested several times that we look at the Policy Adaptor pattern
> used by the Iterator Adaptors Library. It certainly makes the problem of
> policy interaction go away, since all of the policies are collected in one
> place... but there have been no replies, and I am wondering why. Is it
> as inappropriate for smart pointers? Are people having trouble
> the suggestion?
Yes (to the second question.)
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk