Re: [boost] Loki SmartPtr study: Policy orthogonality issues

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-07 13:08:52

Sorry, my fault. I guesss I was daunted even by three (plus one concrete
class). I've read this chapter of your book more carefully in the last few
hours. I'll try to post a Policy Adaptor version of it soon so we have
something more concrete to compare it with.

Regards,
Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Loki SmartPtr study: Policy orthogonality issues

> > documentation. Of /course/ I am biased, but I find the approach used by
> > SmartPtr using five template template parameters to be much more
daunting.
>
> Three.
>
> Andrei
>
> ---------------------------------
> Check out THE C++ Seminar:  3 Days with 5 Experts
> http://www.gotw.ca/cpp_seminar/
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Send unsubscribe requests to:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>