From: rgarcia1771 (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-07 15:02:54
--- In boost_at_y..., Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_g...> wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
> - Needs attention to the fact that classes having dependent base
> classes don't have the members of the base class visible for
> unqualified lookup.
Could you elaborate on this? Is some of the code non-conformant (wrt
C++ Standard)? I understand the basic idea of what you are referring
to, but a specific example would be helpful.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk