Re: [boost] Borland library concept checking

From: Thomas Maeder (maeder_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-08 13:03:58

David Abrahams wrote:

> 
> It looks as though Borland's compiler includes some built-in concept
> checking for standard library functions, but it also looks somewhat broken.

Indeed:

http://pso.inprise.com/webcustomer/clearexx_cgi/x_Case_Bug.htm?case.id_number=432295&case.cclist2=ThomasMaeder

http://pso.inprise.com/webcustomer/clearexx_cgi/x_Case_Bug.htm?case.id_number=432296&case.cclist2=ThomasMaeder

> When I try to compile counting_iterator_test.cpp with Borland it gives me
> lots of incorrect warnings about random access iterators being output
> iterators. I know the iterator tag is correct at least; I verified it with a
> STATIC_ASSERT(). Does anyone have a clue why this is happening, and how to
> work around it?

Disabling the warning using the command-line options -w-8091 -w-8092 is
the only "solution" I know.