Re: [boost] Re: Proposal: Sorted Vector Container

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-08 17:42:31

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Daniel" <cpdaniel_at_[hidden]>

> One difference (I think) in what I implemented versus the others that have
been described is that I did not embed the
> sequence container within the associative container.  Instead, my
sequence_set<> (or map) would be constructed "on top
> of" an existing sequence, thus both interfaces are available to the
client.  Caveat programmer :)

That's what I did, too (roughly).

> > > - Not exception safe for objects whose copy operations can throw.
> >
> > Disagree, again.
>
> Provides the exact exception safety guarantee that the underlying sequence
container provides.

That's better.