From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-14 10:07:33
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
> From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> > Be careful. There is an interaction between operator and
> > ConversionPolicy. For an array, if the ConversionPolicy will cause
> > operator T* to be supplied, then operator should not be supplied. In
> > other words, inter-policy communication is needed.
> Hmm, I guess in this particular case there's no harm in simply leaving
> operator in there, even if you do provide a conversion to pointer. The
> compiler will prefer it, which is a good thing because you have more
Sometimes having both operator and a conversion to a pointer creates
ambiguities, depending on the type of the index.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk