From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-14 14:07:19
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> My point was that if simulating cancellation is so trivial, we should
> include the code that does this in boost.threads, not make users reinvent
> it. It will be at least a starting point.
I agree. There's no better way to find out how a design can be improved than
to get people using it. If it's a feature lots of people need, the solution
isn't actually /broken/ and it's better than nothing, we should supply it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk