From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-16 11:49:49
Do you feel that someone is failing to account for the considerable
experience of the pthreads committee? That would certainly be a mistake, but
I didn't notice it happening.
----- Original Message -----
From: "terekhov" <terekhov_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:19 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: first sight
> --- In boost_at_y..., "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_m...> wrote:
> > I'm starting to see your point. Designing a C++ threading library
> > scratch without taking into account the considerable experience of
> > pthreads committee?
> (and compatibility issues wrt existing PTHREADS/C++ impls,
> e.g. LGPL pthreads-win32/VCE option)
> alexander, having nothing to do myself with pthreads
> committee other than just being PTHREADS fan with a
> little WIN32/JAVA threading experience too.
> Info: http://www.boost.org Send unsubscribe requests to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk