Re: alternative tuple implementation (was: [boost] Re: Any interest for a parser class?)

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-17 09:45:33

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]>

> I am not sure about the number of template instantiations - it might be
> pretty much the same, - but, for one thing, they (instantiations) won't be
> nested, so it's very likely that such implementation will also take a less
> time to compile (compilers with EDG front-end is a different story, and
> there are ways to deal with them :). But the main advantage would be, of
> course, a size/speed of the generated code.

Agreed, that's crucially important! Why will the code be faster?