From: bill_kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-17 12:26:44
--- In boost_at_y..., "terekhov" <terekhov_at_d...> wrote:
> --- In boost_at_y..., Tom Becker <voidampersand_at_f...> wrote:
> > >4) Allow the user to "eat" the exception.
> > >5) Make the cancellation "flag" a sticky flag, so if the
> I would much appreciate if someone would explain me
> the usefulness of N4 and N5 (other than ability
> to play tennis, I mean N4 handler and cancel.point/
You yourself have been arguing for N4. N5 just insures the request
doesn't silently go away if someone inadvertantly "eats" the
> Why not just say that it is *undefined* behavior?
You mean say it's undefined behavior if the user doesn't rethrow?
What does this specification buy either the user or the implementer?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk