Boost logo

Boost :

From: David A. Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-18 16:14:21

Vladimir Prus wrote:

> I'm currently in process of writing a code that is intended to deal with all
> the options style that I've aware of. So far it looks like some
> disambiguation decisions must be made and somebody might not like them. On
> the other hand, I don't see much implementation problems.

I look forward to your results. It's good that folks are starting
to dig more deeply into this.

> fewer way of tweaking syntax than I'd like). If I succeed, then there will be
> a flexible command line parser with only a few dependencies on standard
> headers, which will be usable separately and as low-level part for the
> already-written semantic part. I think that in this case there simply won't
> be a reason to use Spirit.

David Held makes a good case for using Spirit: commonality. But
let's crunch the numbers and see what we get.


"Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music,
  and you know how big he was."  --  James P. Johnson

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at