From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-18 17:48:16
--- In boost_at_y..., Peter Schmitteckert (boost) <boost_at_s...> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 January 2002 15:35, Toon Knapen wrote:
> > theoretically scalar-matrix multiplication is commutative and
thus a * M
> > == M * a.
> BTW, is one allowed to use "non-commutative" scalars for ublas,
> or is it implied that "a * b == b * a" ?
To get usual linear algebra functionality, one should assume that the
scalars form the approximation of a field. But I currently do not see
any obvious reason, why one couldn't try to use a noncommutative
multiplication for scalars. But then the approximations of vector
space laws and linear operator properties may not hold.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk