Re: [boost] first experiences with boost.python

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-18 18:02:48

I would suggest using an up-to-date version of the boost sources. Recent
releases are just superior. More functionality, fewer bugs, etc.

-Dave

P.S. A notable change in the current source is that the library can now be
built as a shared lib, so all of your extension modules will be smaller.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hugo van der Merwe" <hugogeek_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] first experiences with boost.python

> > No, I should have been clearer: the message you're seeing has nothing to
do
> > with the version of the Boost.Python source you're using. This is a
report
> > that some code was compiled against a different version of Python than
the
> > one you're targeting. It's possible some of that is in
libboost_python.a; If
> > you're using a precompiled library, just rebuild it against the version
of
> > the Python headers you're using.
>
> Ah, yes, thanks. I had precompiled library built against python1.5. Now
> I'm wondering if it's still important for me to get newer boost.python.
> I'll go read the changelog.
>
> Thanks,
> Hugo van der Merwe
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Send unsubscribe requests to:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>