From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-18 18:02:48
I would suggest using an up-to-date version of the boost sources. Recent
releases are just superior. More functionality, fewer bugs, etc.
P.S. A notable change in the current source is that the library can now be
built as a shared lib, so all of your extension modules will be smaller.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hugo van der Merwe" <hugogeek_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] first experiences with boost.python
> > No, I should have been clearer: the message you're seeing has nothing to
> > with the version of the Boost.Python source you're using. This is a
> > that some code was compiled against a different version of Python than
> > one you're targeting. It's possible some of that is in
> > you're using a precompiled library, just rebuild it against the version
> > the Python headers you're using.
> Ah, yes, thanks. I had precompiled library built against python1.5. Now
> I'm wondering if it's still important for me to get newer boost.python.
> I'll go read the changelog.
> Hugo van der Merwe
> Info: http://www.boost.org Send unsubscribe requests to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk