From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-19 08:23:58
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Maeder" <maeder_at_[hidden]>
> Am 2002.01.18 21:36 schrieb(en) Peter Dimov:
> > Good question.
> > Is there a realistic use case where the Derived* -> Base* implicit
> > conversion is useful when Base is not polymorphic? ;-)
> Not so good question, because the answer is obvious. :-)
> But I'm not sure if the two questions are as connected as they might
> seem to. I use a shared_ptr to express object ownership; and we all
> know that it's rarely wise to express ownership of a Derived object
> through a (shared) pointer to Base if the Base destructor isn't virtual.
...which is the reason it might be better if they didn't implicitly convert,
unless Peter's precautions are taken.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk