Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-21 08:36:59

Next message: Douglas Gregor: "Re: [boost] Comments on the preprocessor list data structure"
Previous message: bill_kempf: "Re: Draft of generation 2 thread class"
In reply to: rogeeff: "Re: Ongoing review of printf-like formatting. MSVC prospective"
Next in thread: Samuel Krempp: "Re: [boost] Re: Ongoing review of printf-like formatting. MSVC prospective"

----- Original Message -----
From: "rogeeff" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]>

> Why not to
> use .cpp and .hpp? ( What boost coding says about it?)

Actually, that is a boost requirement, and one of the very first things we
decided as a group.

Next message: Douglas Gregor: "Re: [boost] Comments on the preprocessor list data structure"
Previous message: bill_kempf: "Re: Draft of generation 2 thread class"
In reply to: rogeeff: "Re: Ongoing review of printf-like formatting. MSVC prospective"
Next in thread: Samuel Krempp: "Re: [boost] Re: Ongoing review of printf-like formatting. MSVC prospective"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk