From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-21 15:32:24
>>Basically, just use a function like this:
>> template<int N> ... size(Int<N>);
>>Works in MSVC++ 6 and has neat syntax.
> How do you like the idea of using free functions like
> template<class M, int N>
> size_t size (const M &m, int<N>);
> for these operations instead?
I would find it less intuitive.
Would a free function be possible in MSVC, but a template member
function would not ? (I'm not familiar with MSVC)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk