Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-21 23:15:18


I'd be happy with either assoc_list or alist, though I still prefer
associative_list. In general I believe that long, descriptive names for
classes and functions are good (Alex Stepanov beat this into my head while
I was working at SGI). I think the amount of information conveyed to the
reader of the code is more important than these other issues.

Just my $0.02,
Jeremy

On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, David Abrahams wrote:
> > doesn't have the logarithmic-time lookup of multimap. I suppose I could go
> > with
> > assoc_list, but that's unpronounceable. Any other ideas?
>
> elisp (regular lisp, too?) has "alists" which are exactly what you're
> building.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek http://www.osl.iu.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org) office phone: (812) 855-3608
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk