|
Boost : |
From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-22 10:14:52
I suggest sending a bug report to Borland.
I'm afraid Borland has been low on my priority list of compilers to
support for the BGL. There are a few reasons: 1) its standards comformance
is not terribly good, meaning doing workarounds can be a lot of work 2) it
is not as widely used as other compilers (at least, that is the impression
I get), and 3) I hope to graduate some day. If anyone else is interested
in porting BGL to Borland, let me know!
Best regards,
Jeremy
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, luxin wrote:
luxin> Hi all,
luxin>
luxin> I test Dijkstra example in the Graph library, using Borland C++
luxin> compiler 5.5, get the invalid template argument in the following
luxin> sentence
luxin>
luxin> std::vector<vertex_descriptor> p(num_vertices(g));
luxin>
luxin> stuation remain if I change to
luxin>
luxin> std::vector<vertex_descriptor> p(vertices(g));
luxin>
luxin> but compiler can pass
luxin>
luxin> std::vector<int> d(num_vertices(g));
luxin>
luxin>
luxin> Regards,
luxin> Xin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Siek http://php.indiana.edu/~jsiek/
Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org) office phone: (812) 855-3608
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk