From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-23 12:36:27
On 1/23/02 7:23 AM, "Douglas Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> GCC using libstdc++-v2 is missing the std::boolalpha and std::noboolalpha
> I/O manipulators, which causes the libs/array/array5.cpp testcase to fail
> under GCC 2.95.x.
> Shall I add a BOOST_NO_BOOLALPHA configuration macro, to be set in
> config/stdlib/sgi.hpp in the libstdc++-v2 section?
I don't think that working boolalpha support is relevant to the array
library. So I think that adding BOOST_NO_BOOLALPHA would be overkill.
Instead, perhaps we can just dumb down array5.cpp by doing
(a.empty() ? "true" : "false")
and adding a comment that explains why we don't use boolalpha.
I'd feel differently if the boolalpha feature was more closely related to
the class being tested.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk