From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-23 13:33:24
From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> Well, what do you think of rolling Doug's code into ref.hpp (with
> appropriate change below for strict correctness)?
That's fine with me.
> Aren't you the author of ref.hpp?
ref.hpp was an internal tuple header that I moved to boost/ since it's so
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] Suggested ref.hpp modification
> > From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> > > Ah good, that avoids using inheritance to distinguish these babies...
> > > but is char really guaranteed to be smaller than double (half-joking
> > only).
> > No, that's why I use char (&yes)  and char (&no) .
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk