Re: [boost] Suggested ref.hpp modification

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-23 13:33:24

From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> Well, what do you think of rolling Doug's code into ref.hpp (with
> appropriate change below for strict correctness)?

That's fine with me.

> Aren't you the author of ref.hpp?

ref.hpp was an internal tuple header that I moved to boost/ since it's so
cool.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] Suggested ref.hpp modification
>
>
> > From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> > > Ah good, that avoids using inheritance to distinguish these babies...
> > > but is char really guaranteed to be smaller than double (half-joking
> > only).
> >
> > No, that's why I use char (&yes) [1] and char (&no) [2].