From: rogeeff (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-23 17:30:38
--- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
> > > What's the key difference? Why wouldn't Program ExMon be used
> > test
> > > programs?
> > Test Execution Monitor will allow to use Test Tools.
> ...and why wouldn't Test Execution Monitor be used for production
Test Execution Monitor could be used to monitor production programs.
But since they does not contain any Test Tools references, no reason
to use Test Execution Monitor, since PrExeMon will do the work for
less overhead (no big a defference but still).
There is also subtle differences in error reporting mechanisms.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk