Re: Boost.Test docs: **** missing!! ****

From: rogeeff (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-23 17:30:38

--- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:

> > > What's the key difference? Why wouldn't Program ExMon be used 
for
> > test
> > > programs?
> >
> > Test Execution Monitor will allow to use Test Tools.

> ...and why wouldn't Test Execution Monitor be used for production 
programs?

Test Execution Monitor could be used to monitor production programs. 
But since they does not contain any Test Tools references, no reason 
to use Test Execution Monitor, since PrExeMon will do the work for 
less overhead (no big a defference but still). 
  There is also subtle differences in error reporting mechanisms.

Gennadiy.