From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-24 12:31:30
At 06:32 PM 1/23/2002, bill_kempf wrote:
>This brings up a question. For changes such as this do we need a
>formal review period before integrating into the library? It may not
>seem so for this small change, but when I add the new concepts, such
>as read/write locks, I'm not so sure the answer is the same.
We need procedures for a "Mini-Review" - less formal than a full review,
but gives others a chance to review important changes to already reviewed
Sometimes this would cut it when a new library is accepted subject to so
many changes a mini-review is necessary.
Other times because a stable library is about to get major changes.
Might mini-reviews work something like this:
* Announced at will by the developer. [to cut administrivia]
* Announcement subject always to include Mini-Review Request" [to alert
both human readers and email filters]
* To run at least 7 days. [to ensure time for comments]
* Developer responsible for rattling people's cages to get at least one
response from other than the developer.
* Developer responsible for responding to comments, and deciding if they
are serious enough to delay acceptance.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk