From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-24 23:13:55
----- Original Message -----
From: "mfdylan" <dylan_at_[hidden]>
> Hmm, there's still a *lot* of disagreement re this whole issue, how
> can you say "it will be accepted" when there's still some fairly
> major interface and implementation decisions to be made? I'm almost
> tempted to say we need to poll for votes for some of the most
> contentious points.
Boost depends on the coexistence of respect for consensus and deference to
the will of the person who's put in the sweat. Once a library is accepted,
its fate is in the hands of its maintainer(s). Samuel is free to call for a
vote if he wants one; he's also free to take the commentary of the group
into account and make an executive decision about this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk