Re: [boost] test_strict_weak_ordering concept tester

From: jpanzer_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-01-28 17:49:37

Hi Jeremy-

The value_type must be copy constructible and (of course) must be compatible with the argument types of
the predicate under test.  Also, for this version, it must have some appropriate operator<< defined for
stream output.  (All the requirements are detailed in the header file in this draft.  If this proves to
be of interest, I'm sure the last requirement can be made optional.)

-John

Jeremy Siek wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> This is great!
>
> BTW, I assume that there are some preconditions on the data set. What are
> they?
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, johnrpanzer wrote:
> jpanze> All,
> jpanze>
> jpanze> Many moons ago, I asked if there would be any interest
> jpanze> in something to do runtime concept checking (at least
> jpanze> for ordering predicates).  One or two people expressed
> jpanze> some mild curiosity, so as part of my New Year's resolutions,
> jpanze> I've uploaded a draft implementation of an ordering
> jpanze> predicate checker to:
> jpanze>
> jpanze> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/test_strict_weak_ordering/
> ...