From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-29 09:29:20
----- Original Message -----
> I was hoping to find a simpler example. One thing not clear to me is
> the first template parameter T. It says "operand type". In the
> example, it is set to "test_iter<T,R,P>", which is a self-reference.
> I'm confused.
The iterator helpers use the same idiom as the rest of the operators library
templates: the first parameter is the type to which you are adding the
operator functionality, i.e. the derived class. Don't worry; it's correct
and it works.
> David> FWIW, most people find the iterator helpers aren't that useful
now that we
> David> have the iterator adaptor library. It does a lot more to
automate the job of
> David> making correct and useful iterators.
> I'll have a look. I thought the adaptors were, well, adaptors. In
> this case, I'm not adapting an existing iterator, but making a new
> one, so I didn't think that the adaptors were applicable.
You can adapt anything; it doesn't have to be an iterator. Your iterator has
some state data, right? Just adapt that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk