From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-29 12:26:30
On 1/29/02 9:24 AM, "davlet_panech" <davlet_panech_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I propose that we make sure that places like scoped_lock constructor
> take a reference to a volatile mutex, instead of a plain one.
Can we instead mark the relevant members of the mutex class volatile on
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk