Re: [boost] boost bind/functional/reference wrapper/mem_fn

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-30 10:12:16

From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <ysapir_at_[hidden]>
> The talk of inline functions gave me an idea.  How about doing something
> like this as a workaround:
[...]
> This way it can remain one header with no extra defines based on whether
> you want/don't want precompiled headers.  Or is something wrong with
> this code?

That's cool. ;-) But the separate header is something that had to be done -
people often express concerns about the placeholders having underscored
names.