From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-30 11:36:28
On 1/30/02 8:17 AM, "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Do we really care about whether the native <limits> header provides
> compile-time constants? I think we can just change the meaning of the
> existing name, since boost/limits.hpp will include the native one if it
> exists. The only difference here is that if you want to use the macro, you
> have to #include <boost/limits.hpp>. Simple.
Sounds good to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk