Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-30 14:26:01

Next message: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "RE: [boost] Objections to removing the old smart pointer class te mplates?"
Previous message: Fernando Cacciola: "RE: [boost] boost bind/functional/reference wrapper/mem_fn"
In reply to: Fernando Cacciola: "RE: [boost] boost bind/functional/reference wrapper/mem_fn"
Next in thread: Yitzhak Sapir: "RE: [boost] boost bind/functional/reference wrapper/mem_fn"

Oops!

The beginning should read:
!!!!
Unless I'm missing something, it ISN'T required that inline functions be
declared inside an unnamed namespace.

Fernando Cacciola
Sierra s.r.l.
fcacciola_at_[hidden]
www.gosierra.com

Next message: Aleksey Gurtovoy: "RE: [boost] Objections to removing the old smart pointer class te mplates?"
Previous message: Fernando Cacciola: "RE: [boost] boost bind/functional/reference wrapper/mem_fn"
In reply to: Fernando Cacciola: "RE: [boost] boost bind/functional/reference wrapper/mem_fn"
Next in thread: Yitzhak Sapir: "RE: [boost] boost bind/functional/reference wrapper/mem_fn"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk