From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-31 05:49:01
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]>
> > IOW why is it important to keep the boost directory clean but
> > this doesn't apply to the boost namespace?
> It does, only the criteria for putting something into namespace are (in
> general) different from criteria of putting a physical unit that contains
> that "something" into a subdirectory; while the empirical rule "namespace
> nesting should match directory nesting" is important for keeping logical
> physical structures of code in sync, it's by no means the only rule. There
> are satiations when going further in the classification of physical units
> important because it allows you to expose, well, the classification
> without imposing a bureaucratic overhead of such classification on the
> of the "logical side".
This is a good general argument, but let's get back to specifics, shall we?
You want to force every shared_ptr user to type
What problem are you trying to solve, and is your proposed "solution" worth
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk