|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
- Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
- In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
- Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
- Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
On Thursday 31 January 2002 11:43 am, you wrote:
> From: "Douglas Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]>
>
> > So bind won't swallow return values?
>
> No, bind<void> currently doesn't swallow return values.
Should it? I know the answer to be "yes" for function, because that makes it
much more flexible, and it seems that bind should also swallow return values
if only because finding the return type for a function object can be a
harrowing task that nobody should have to go through, especially if they
don't care about the return value.
Doug
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
- Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
- In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
- Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
- Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Config, function+bind on Borland, and BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk