|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-01 12:35:05
----- Original Message -----
From: <graham.shanks_at_[hidden]>
> Without wishing to gainsay the development of the Cyclic Iterator
> Adaptor in this thread I think that this is missing an important
> point. All the examples in the documentation of the iterator
> adaptor library show adapators of iterators (excluding the
> existing counting_iterator example which as Dave says may not be
> that useful).
Just to be clear: what I meant was that counting_iterator might not be a
very useful example of adapting a non-iterator, since the countable concept
is so close to that of an iterator. Counting iterators themselves are
extremely useful.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk