From: Gustavo Guerra (gustavobt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-02 18:32:04
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> on 2/1/02 6:27 PM, Gustavo Guerra at gustavobt_at_[hidden] wrote:
> > I took a look at the proposal, and there's no macros on the interface.
> > used macros on the implementation to avoid repetition, where he could
> > used the Currioulsy Recuring Template pattern. Isn't the interface the
> > important thing here?
> How would you have used the Curiously Recurring Template pattern here?
Well, maybe I rushed into conclusions too fast. Sorry. I just assumed that
the CRT was what you tried to use but your compiler didn't let you, as I
took a _very_quick_ look at your code and was the only thing I could remeber
that needed a littel more template support from the compiler to avoid that
kind of repetition you avoided with those macros (remembering
http://www.cuj.com/experts/1906/langer.htm?topic=experts). But looking
closely, maybe it doesn't apply in this case.
If it wasn't the CRT, what else did you experiment to replace the macros
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk