Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-03 18:00:43

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Valid HTML in Boost documentation"
Previous message: rogeeff: "Cycle Iterator Adapter (was: Re: Help with iterator helpers)"
In reply to: Mark Rodgers: "Re: [boost] auto_vector - vector with auto_ptr semantics"
Next in thread: mike_at_[hidden]: "Re: [boost] auto_vector - vector with auto_ptr semantics"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>
> But I don't know if the added safety of either is worth the
> trouble. What do others think? Keep it simple or make it safe?

If you make it safe the iterators will be input iterators instead of
random-access iterators. ;-/

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Valid HTML in Boost documentation"
Previous message: rogeeff: "Cycle Iterator Adapter (was: Re: Help with iterator helpers)"
In reply to: Mark Rodgers: "Re: [boost] auto_vector - vector with auto_ptr semantics"
Next in thread: mike_at_[hidden]: "Re: [boost] auto_vector - vector with auto_ptr semantics"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk