From: mfdylan (dylan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-06 19:33:36
--- In boost_at_y..., "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_h...> wrote:
> I agree that a nicer default template argument mechanism (such as an
> exclamation mark meaning, "use the default here") would make things
> but by and large, I don't consider this to be a problem.
Why exclamation mark? Surely just omitting it entirely would be
Is there any reason that would cause a parsing problem?
Personally I'd like to see this extended to function calls too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk