Re: Policy-based vector? [was: Submission: Fixed-Capacity STL Containers Library]

From: mfdylan (dylan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-06 19:33:36

--- In boost_at_y..., "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_h...> wrote:
> 
> I agree that a nicer default template argument mechanism (such as an
> exclamation mark meaning, "use the default here") would make things 
better,
> but by and large, I don't consider this to be a problem.
> 
Why exclamation mark?  Surely just omitting it entirely would be 
preferable:

my_vector<int,,range_checking> v;

Is there any reason that would cause a parsing problem?
Personally I'd like to see this extended to function calls too.

Dylan